Skip to content

Archaeological Resources

CU-01 · Matrix · Cultural Resources

Rating
UnknownEvidence insufficient to rate; an information request is listed
Why
Presence unknown
Worst case
Not above the rating
Evidence
Missing
Cited claims
1
Requirements
0
Requests
2

Rating

UnknownEvidence insufficient to rate; an information request is listed

The rule

Code computed the rating from the assessor's inputs:

present=unknown -> Unknown (abstain)

Set by the rule

Decision
Abstained (information request)
Evidence state
Missing · no evidence in hand

Conclusion withheld

Question
Are recorded archaeological sites, cemeteries or tribal cultural resources present in the study area?
Missing evidence
Cultural resources desktop review, Phase I archaeological survey, and SHPO/THPO correspondence.
Consequence
Presence, extent and Section 106 pathway cannot be rated; possible schedule and cost exposure remains unquantified.
Information request
Provide any cultural resources review, SHPO site file search results or SHPO/THPO correspondence for Brook Hollow Solar.
Blocks the decision
No

Revision

Not revised.

The five inputs

  • Present: unknown

    No claims address recorded archaeological sites, cemeteries or tribal cultural resources. The only related claim (C-18f20d1141) concerns a farm debris pile, not cultural resources. Silence is not evidence of absence.

    Cites C-18f20d1141

  • Extent: unknown

    No cultural resources documented, so position relative to buildable area cannot be assessed.

    Cites no claim.

  • Avoidable: unknown

    Not established; no sites or high-potential areas are documented.

    Cites no claim.

  • Pathway: none

    Placeholder because presence is unknown.

    Cites no claim.

  • Impact likely: no

    Placeholder because presence is unknown.

    Cites no claim.

Comments

No cultural resources desktop review, Phase I archaeological survey or SHPO/THPO correspondence is included in the data room. Archaeological resources, cemeteries and tribal cultural resources are not addressed. A state site file review would settle presence.

Critique

Verdict
upheld
Suggested direction for the rating
same
Summary

Abstention is correct because the evidence is silent on cultural resources. The debris pile claim is properly dismissed. Agencies are plausible for Indiana. Only minor gaps: no federal-nexus screen and no named tribes in the next steps.

Critic model
Luminol

Issues

  1. Severity minor · Kind other

    Citing the farm debris pile claim is harmless but tangential. The assessment correctly treats it as non-cultural. Pathway 'none' and impact 'no' are labelled placeholders. Section 106 and the SHPO requirements are conditional, and S-06 is unverified, so listing agencies without asserting a pathway is acceptable. The assessment could add that the ~1,356-acre footprint and a likely federal nexus (for example a Section 404 permit) would trigger Section 106 review.

    Cites C-18f20d1141

  2. Severity minor · Kind missing_next_step

    Next steps could name a federal-nexus screen (404 or other federal permit) to decide whether Section 106 applies. They could also name the specific tribes or THPOs to contact. Neither omission changes the Unknown category.

Checks

  • Passed

    rating_has_evidence · blocking

  • Passed

    abstention_not_contradicted · blocking

  • Passed

    numbers_grounded · not blocking

  • Passed

    agencies_grounded · not blocking

  • Passed

    cutoff_respected · blocking

  • Passed

    abstention_complete · not blocking

  • Passed

    critic_not_refuted · blocking

Evidence (1)

Each claim the row cites: the statement in the assessor's words, then the quote the engine found on the page.

Phase I ESA 2023-01-20

C-18f20d1141 · Page 1 of 1 · DR-0004

Open the claim, C-18f20d1141

A small de minimis farm debris pile was observed near the Parcel 12 barn; removal is recommended.

Quote check Exact · Placed verbatim · The quote occurs on the page exactly as written. · Read as native

SYNTHETIC TEST FIXTURE - FICTIONAL PROJECT Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ASTM E1527-21) Brook Hollow Solar Project January 20, 2023 This assessment has revealed no recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in connection with the Property. Quote starts. A small farm debris pile (de minimis) was observed near the Parcel 12 barn; removal is recommended. Quote ends.

The outline marks where the quote begins on the page.

Page 1 of Phase I ESA 2023-01-20
  1. C-18f20d1141

    A small de minimis farm debris pile was observed near the Parcel 12 barn; removal is recommended.

    Quoted from page 1
    A small farm debris pile (de minimis) was observed near the Parcel 12 barn; removal is recommended.

    Phase I ESA 2023-01-20 · DR-0004 · Page 1 · 2023-01-20

    Source field_study · Claim type presence · Polarity presence · Confidence high · Quote check exact, 100 of 100

    Cited by EN-01, EN-04, CU-02 · Filed under EN-01, EN-04

Requirements and permits

The requirements the assessor tied to this row, by level. Each quote from dated law is shown with its source.

No requirement is tied to this row.

Also in the permit matrix for this row: F-NHPA106, S-06

Information requests

  • IR-1be216979f · High priority

    Provide the shpo / thpo correspondence for the project area, or confirm none exists.

    Missing evidence
    SHPO / THPO correspondence
    Consequence
    Archaeological Resources is rated on no evidence without it.
    Blocks the decision
    Yes
    Raised by
    completeness
  • IR-00324803c2 · Medium priority

    Are recorded archaeological sites, cemeteries or tribal cultural resources present in the study area?

    Missing evidence
    Cultural resources desktop review, Phase I archaeological survey, and SHPO/THPO correspondence.
    Consequence
    Presence, extent and Section 106 pathway cannot be rated; possible schedule and cost exposure remains unquantified.
    Blocks the decision
    No
    Raised by
    abstention

Next steps

  • Commission cultural resources desktop review of Indiana SHPO site files.
  • Phase I archaeological survey of disturbance areas if review indicates potential.
  • Request any existing SHPO/THPO correspondence from the developer.

Agencies

  • Indiana DNR DHPA (SHPO)
  • THPO

Cost and impact

Impact
None given.
Potential cost level
N/A
Why

Presence unknown; cost exposure cannot be assessed.

Impact: C = cost, S = schedule. Potential cost level: L, L-M, M, M-H, H (relative to a utility-scale solar budget).

Lumerian Labs 2026