Skip to content

Historic Structures and Districts: desk report

Word file

One row of the risk matrix, CU-02 Historic Structures and Districts, in the Cultural Resources section: what the record holds on it.

A desk review of the record as it stood: not a field survey and not a modelled study.

Information cut-off
2023-08-15
Row in the matrix
CU-02 Historic Structures and Districts
All reports

Downloads

This report as a Word file, and the engine's own files for the whole run.

1Finding

UnknownEvidence insufficient to rate; an information request is listed

The rule

Code computed the rating from the assessor's inputs:

present=unknown -> Unknown (abstain)

Set by the rule

Decision
Abstained (information request)
Evidence state
MISSING · no evidence in hand

The assessor's comments

No historic architecture survey or NRHP review is included in the data room. Presence of listed or eligible historic properties, including any associated with the Parcel 12 barn, is not addressed. A state inventory and NRHP database review would settle it.

Conclusion withheld

Question
Are there NRHP-listed or eligible historic structures, districts or landscapes in or near the Brook Hollow Solar study area?
Missing evidence
Historic architecture survey or NRHP/state inventory review.
Consequence
Section 106 or SHPO review scope, visual mitigation and schedule exposure cannot be determined.
Information request
Provide any historic architecture survey, SHPO correspondence or NRHP/state inventory review for the site, or authorize a desktop review.
Blocks the decision
No

2What the record shows

The five inputs

  • Present: unknown

    No claim addresses listed or eligible historic properties in or near the study area. The only related claim (C-18f20d1141) notes a farm debris pile near a Parcel 12 barn; it says nothing about historic status or eligibility. Silence is not absence.

    Cites C-18f20d1141

  • Extent: unknown

    No historic properties are documented, so their position relative to the site is unknown.

    Cites no claim.

  • Avoidable: unknown

    Avoidability cannot be judged without documented historic properties.

    Cites no claim.

  • Pathway: none

    Placeholder because presence is unknown.

    Cites no claim.

  • Impact likely: no

    Placeholder because presence is unknown.

    Cites no claim.

Supporting statements (1)

Each claim the row cites: the statement in the assessor's words, then the quote the engine found on the page.

  1. C-18f20d1141

    A small de minimis farm debris pile was observed near the Parcel 12 barn; removal is recommended.

    Quoted from page 1
    A small farm debris pile (de minimis) was observed near the Parcel 12 barn; removal is recommended.

    Phase I ESA 2023-01-20 · DR-0004 · Page 1 · 2023-01-20

    Source field_study · Claim type presence · Polarity presence · Confidence high · Quote check exact, 100 of 100

    Cited by EN-01, EN-04, CU-01 · Filed under EN-01, EN-04

    See it on page 1, claim C-18f20d1141

3Permits and requirements

The requirements tied to the rows of this report, by level.

Engine 0.1.0, which made this run, wrote no timelines or citations of law.

Federal (1)

  • Section 106 consultation

    F-NHPA106 · Lead federal agency with the State Historic Preservation Office (and THPOs)

    Applicability
    Conditional
    Instrument
    National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 (54 U.S.C. 306108); 36 CFR Part 800
    Trigger
    Federal nexus, for example an individual Section 404 permit or federal funding.
    Description

    A federal undertaking (federal permit, funding, license or land) must take into account effects on historic properties.

    Verification
    PACK_PENDING_QUALIFIED_REVIEW
    Source
    pack:federal
    In the permit matrix
    F-NHPA106

State (1)

  • SHPO review; Section 106 consultation if a federal nexus exists; DNR Archaeology Plan/Permit for state-land or discovered human remains

    S-06 · Indiana DNR Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (SHPO)

    Applicability
    Conditional
    Instrument
    IC 14-21-1 Historic Preservation and Archaeology Act, state permit
    Trigger
    Federal nexus (e.g. 404 permit) or discovery of burials/archaeological artifacts
    Description

    No general state review for private land without a state or federal nexus, but SHPO consultation is triggered through federal permits. Inadvertent discovery of human remains or burials requires DNR notification under IC 14-21-1.

    As of the cut-off

    As of 2023-08-15. Federal nexus is missing from the project facts.

    Verification
    MODEL_KNOWLEDGE_UNVERIFIED
    Source
    model:jurisdiction
    In the permit matrix
    S-06

4What is missing

The information requests the run raised for the rows of this report, by priority: what is missing, what follows from it, and whether it holds up the decision.

High priority (1)

  • IR-ac5fadd7ce · High priority

    Provide the historic architecture survey or nrhp review for the project area, or confirm none exists.

    Missing evidence
    Historic architecture survey or NRHP review
    Consequence
    Historic Structures and Districts is rated on no evidence without it.
    Blocks the decision
    Yes
    Raised by
    completeness

Medium priority (1)

  • IR-a02194a069 · Medium priority

    Are there NRHP-listed or eligible historic structures, districts or landscapes in or near the Brook Hollow Solar study area?

    Missing evidence
    Historic architecture survey or NRHP/state inventory review.
    Consequence
    Section 106 or SHPO review scope, visual mitigation and schedule exposure cannot be determined.
    Blocks the decision
    No
    Raised by
    abstention

5Next steps and agencies

Next steps

  • Review Indiana SHPO inventory (IHSSI) and NRHP listings within and near the site.
  • Commission a historic architecture survey and visual effects assessment if listed or eligible properties are found.

Agencies

  • Indiana DNR DHPA (SHPO)

6Basis and limits

This report is a desk review of the documents quoted above, as the engine read them for an information cut-off of 2023-08-15.

It is not a field survey and not a modelled study: this review made no site visit and ran no acoustic, hydraulic or other model. Where the record is silent, the report says what is missing; it does not fill the gap.

Every statement, figure and quote is the engine's record as written. The headings and connecting words are fixed text of this room, the same in every report.

Documents quoted (1)

Versions and data hashes

As the engine and the exporter recorded them. Hashes are SHA-256.

Information cut-off
2023-08-15
Engine version
0.1.0
Prompt version
2026-10-02.1
Rows pack
rows.json sha256 d1df27b21f79b09d
Federal pack
federal.json sha256 aa17c41356542d46
State pack
none
Local pack
Not written by this engine
Data room manifest
6141b7dc1f8441489d39e4023d551e4c0021a37ce4f9ad157607d9096c58bfb5
Audit chain
valid (92 events)
QA status
PASS
Rendered at
2026-10-01T21:09:12+00:00
Run record (annex)
a03418c2562baa8a57b7c256ce665acd2c20e92d06e365604d162e9029f8fdd6
Exporter
Prism/room/exporter 1.4.0

Prism desk report · engine 0.1.0 · prompts 2026-10-02.1 · information cut-off 2023-08-15

Lumerian Labs 2026